Discussing The Knife Crime In Britain Criminology Essay

Discussing The dig Crime In Britain Criminology Essay particle 1 The Problem of Knife Crime in Britain. In June 2006, 15 years old Alex Mulumbu after celebrating the end of his GCSEs exams became one more(prenominal) than dupe of Britains dig culture. The victim after he got off a deal with friends in Lambeth, s byh London had an argu custodyt with a larger conference of teenagers (Woolcock, 2006). During the dispute members of the gang disappe atomic number 18d and returned armed with knives, baseb all told bats and hoc lynchpin sticks. Alex was stabbed in the heart and was left lying in a pool of p arentage on the pavement (Verkaik, 2006). His father visited the scene of his sons killing where he declared to the media that Alex was a good boy and had nonhing to do with knives and gangs (Sturcke, 2006).The case survey above is a clear example of how dig guilty offense is pictured by the media. A teenager who is getting off a motorcoach and it happens to get stabbed by the perpetrator. However, the reality of dig execration is not only if a cruddy-white sheer of good versus bad. The nature of such a paradox is complicated and the responses towards it must in that locationfore be multi-faceted (House of Commons). After all, if jab b other(a) was that easy, it would seduce been solved already.One difficultity is that the victims are not invariably good honest citizens who were in the disparage place at the wrong time. The victims are ofttimes victimized before and are also those who are takeing knives in the first place (and actually their own natural language is utilise against them). (www.direct.gov.uk).Furthermore, the offenders and victims status in not always differentiated, since the victims carry knives because they are often linked to gangs or require close to kind of affiliation with highway culture. This, in turn, could mean that a significant equaliser of stabbings relate to back upageway violence (www.docstoc.com), and as Professor Brohi claims a in truth small proportion of wound disgust victims are innocent pot walking grim the street who are stabbed (House of Commons).The media make knife equity-breaking even more complex as they often cloud peoples perception by generating clean panic and by giving the impression that knife abomination is out of control (Albertazzi, 2010473). This good panic, in turn, leads to fear of crime and tender disorganization.Knife crime is also complex in it ego as it is a typic of lack of kindly control within societies. Knife crime looks insoluble and as thither is no connection between adults-teenagers (Hume, 2008), although it involves fresh people and shatters lives. In particular, knife crime in itself gives the impression that nearlyhow it is a matter of boy alike peoples world since teenagers are on their own, surviving on the streets (Asthana, 2008). Thus, those who do not live in that kind of environments (outsiders) can neer understan d.Finally, knife crime is complex because in that respect is no answer to the psyche why teenagers carry knives. We do not k straight off whether teenagers carry knives for self nurseion and because of the growing lack of trust in the ability of adults to protect them (Kelbie, 2003), or whether carry knives for things equivalent respect knife carrying is thought to be largely driven by a concern for self security nibs or to enhance status (Muncie, 200936).Continuing the study I am going to produce a report divided into three key sections. The first will be the extent of knife crime in Britain. The second will look at the causes of knife crime and finally the third will produce some initiatives dealing with knife crime. atom 2 The Extent of Knife Crime in BritainFurthermore, knife crime is very complicated in name of defining whether it is a preponderantly black problem. The media often give the impression that all crimes are pull by black people and wherefore, make people adopt misconceptions (Wright, 2008).Hence, it is distinguished to note that even though the issue looks like it is black in London and the South-East (www.london.gov.uk), at the same time there are surface that suggesting that in the North-East (i.e. Glasgow, Scotland, Manchester) the problem is white (House of Commons). As a result, it might be predominantly a black issue in London moreover certainly not in other places. devoted that, I have concluded that the issue of carrying knives has little to do with beingness black or white, but on the contrary, it has to do with being young and male (Muncie, 2009).Also, knife crime is complicated in terms of definition, since there is no clear Home Office clear definition of knife crime. According to that, the phrase knife crime was adopted by the media and is now popularly used to refer primarily to stabbings but also to the illegitimate carrying of knives by young people (House of Commons). Hence, since there is no clear definition , then, it is probable for the numerous to use different definitions in order to frame statistics and therefore revert more complexity.Furthermore, knife crime is also complicated because there are too many different types of statistics (too much statistical data). In particular, there are statistics for knife crime from the hospital, the law, the British Crime abide by and finally the MORI (House of Commons, 2009). Each of these sources, measure different samples and different places (regions) in the rural and therefore, it is too complicated to understand what is natural event (Summers, 2008). For example, hospitals define knife crime when somebody has severe internal injuries as a result of knife penetration, whereas police define it when someone is carrying a knife (House of Commons)Furthermore, trying to measure knife crime is, again, difficult because there is also the dark foresee of crime. Therefore, this hidden crime makes statistics themselves problematic (Messersc hmidt, 1993).However, above all else, the complexity of knife crime is related to the media. The media manipulate the statistics and distort peoples perceptions about knife crime, since they are powerful and so pervasive in terms of their ability to gain views (Jewkes, 2004).One distortion is that knife crime is predominantly a black issue. Given that, even though evidence suggest that knife crime is also a white problem (in other areas), yet, the media continue the trick constantly acc use blacks (scapegoats). According to that, I guess that this misrepresentation leads to moral panic which, in turn, somehow makes the statistics go up.In other words, since teenagers deputise with the media (moral panic), then, they whitethorn feel fear of the streets and therefore done self fulfilling prophecy, swallow carrying knives for self protection. Hence, there is an interaction-interrelationship between the statistics and knife crime (Newburn, 2007).Regarding to the problems associate d with knife crime measurement, I believe that data should be collected through a regional setting and this is for two reasons. Firstly, because as indicated, knife crime is not a specific cultural issue of Blacks, and secondly, because the measurement of such a complex issue through depicted object settings, inevitable will generate too many complicated statistical data.Furthermore, and as Young (1988) argues, national settings tend to miss some important elements in the distribution of victimisation (Newburn, 2007). Hence, I suggest a regional setting both in areas with the highest knife-crime rates, but also to areas where crime rate is low. This, in turn, we will dish up us understand why it is black issue in some places whereas white in other.Equally important is to collect data using qualitative approaches, since it would be more beneficial to understand the lived experiences of those who carry knives ( logicale commode knife crime) instead of how many carry a knife (What w ould be the point of knowing that 4000 are carrying knives after all?). For example, it would be very interesting to understand how knife crime is perceived and interpreted by the juvenile delinquents (ethnog cuthy research) and thus, find out why they carry knives. This way, more evidence will come up such as whether knife crime relates to Londons (for example) rates of poverty, neglect, unemployment and deprivation (House of Commons).Section 3 The Causes of Knife Crime in Britain.The social development theory is one of the most enduring approaches among the criminological theories that underscore the nature of peoples involvement in social relationships. Sutherland, considered previous criminological theories and argued that anyone in society can be trained to adopt and represent patterns of crime and deviation (Colombo, 2009).In accordance to Sutherlands first derivative tie beam conception, the prestigiousness of criminals, the duration of contact between offenders-potentia l offenders and the frequency of interactions with criminal offenders, are all contributing factors in an individuals likeliness to occupy criminal activities. Sutherland also suggested that attention with the development of criminal behaviours in social groups, for instance rough and spoilt attitudes, boosts the individuals propensity to interiorize criminal attitudes.Social learning therefore, links to the causes of knife crime as well as links to masculinity and rational choice perspectives. According to differential association concept, boys are growing up to be men. This process of affirming masculinity promotes boys to develop a public piece (an exterior) of being tough, macho and fearless.In the context of knife crime this instrument that men have to be risk takers, aggressive and support their hawkish nature (i.e. territoriality). Boys, if lose their reputation in front line of peers and someone undermines their masculinity, in turn, have to regain this reputation by c arrying knives and using them in front of their mates.Thus, since they learn masculinity (via social learning), they learn to behave accordingly to this social role (masculinity) and therefore, act out like men (tough, aggressive). Finally, in terms of applying that to a knife crime, they make the ultimate purpose (rational choice) on whether to carry knives by weighing the benefits (status, respect) against the risks (get stabbed, get caught). To conclude, I believe that there is a link between masculinities and social learning as what seems to be happening today, is that street culture (knife crime) is becoming masculine culture (i.e. through rap music) (Newburn, 2007).However, even though differential association theory is one of the most enduring theories about crime, yet, there are some difficulties in explaining knife crime.First of all, according to the first principle of differential association theory, criminal behaviour is learnt (Colombo, 2009). If that is the case, I be lieve that we have to critically question, how did the first instructor learnt the knife techniques (i.e. hide a knife, disposal once used), so that to pass this knowledge to others? Hence, differential association theory fails to explain the origins of knife crime, since there are no origins.Furthermore, there are no real empirical evidence of links between learning and knife crime. For example, differential association theory does not explain why in similar circumstances, (balance of favorable-unfavourable definitions) some individuals choose to carry a knife whereas others do not.Moreover, social learning theory fails to explain why teenagers develop to associate with those who carry knives. Instead, it focuses more on the peer influence and not on peer selection.Additionally, differential association, supports that all criminal acts are rational (maximase profit-minimise loss) and systematic. However, it fails to explain the spontaneous, wanton acts of violence, which have litt le purpose or utility (Siegel, 2004).Finally, it is very difficult for social scientists to measure such vague variables like excess of definitions favourable to law violation (Colombo, 2009).Section 4 Towards the Reduction of Knife Crime in Britain.The Tackling Knives fill Programme (TKAP) is a multi-million-pound venture, against knife crime. Its main purpose is to delineate the carrying of knives and serious stabbings among teenagers aged between13-19. It involves five government departments and 16 police forces (www.homeoffice.gov.uk).However, Tackling Knives Action Programme (TKAP) has some important limitations in relation to the data, since the recorded crime, curiously the less violent, can be affected by changes in police activity and public reporting to the data. Furthermore, there is a lack of similarity statistics in many areas. Finally, TKAP faced the heterogeneity of the forces (www.homeoffice.gov.uk).Another anti-knife policy that has been introduced is via legis lation to forbid the sale of knives to anyone under the age of 18. Additionally, Police Operations like Blunt and Shield involve the rapid and random deployment of metal detectors in public places such as stations, schools and so forth. The aim of the policy is to target and arrest anyone carrying a knife (www.insight-security.com).However, both the restriction of knives sales under- 18s, as well as the deployment of metal detectors fails to tackle the problem, since kitchen knives for instance, would still be wide available. Hence, it is more a problem of education, rather than access to knives. Furthermore, metal detectors may be not detecting all knives, as knives can be easily hidden and disposed once used.My opinion about tackling of knife crime is that one organization alone cannot end this issue. Given that, I suggest that the main aim of all anti-knife crime initiatives should be to growth the definitions against knife-crime (rational choice theory) so that young people un derstand that carrying knives is immoral but most of all, it is risky (maximize cost, minimize benefit).Furthermore, I support that the best anti knife-crime policy would be to educate the teenagers about this problem (social learning theory). Hence, young people could learn about the consequences of carrying knives at an early age through a mandatory module (i.e. weapon awareness) at schools. Furthermore, I believe that the best initiative to stop knife culture would be if parents (especially the fathers) could show their boys that carrying knives has nothing to do with being a man (masculinity theory).As a conclusion, I argue that Alexs case highlights the need for the authorities to recognize that educating both teenagers and families from an early age is crucial in order to tackle knife crime. Concisely, I have concluded that knife crime is very complex issue because of many reasons. The main one surely is because there are lots of statistical data. Additionally knife crime is c omplex because the media create moral panic and thus does not help. Moreover I have concluded that knife crime is not a black issue but a knife issue and thus, anti knife policies should airt their focus on the rationale behind knife crime.Ultimately, I would like to try to give an explanation of what could have might happen in the case vignette. Alex could have been probably to the enemys territory and showed disrespect on the other boys. He threatened the teenagers with his knife and made them run away. Then, the other boys went to other estate, took knives and returned back in order to regain their reputation and status. They have learnt (social learning) that men never back out (masculinity) and finally, they have made the ultimate decision to take the risk and stab Alex (rational choice).